TEACHER'S DAY USEFULLY MATERIALS
Because of the general nature of approaches, there is often no clear of their assumptions and principles in the classroom. It is difficult for teachers to understand and to use them. Methods lack clear practical application, and require special training, and necessitate major changes in teachers' practices. The notion of methods received criticism in the 1990s for other reasons, and a number of limitations implicit in the notion of all-purpose methods were raised. Then, by the end of twentieth century, mainstream language teaching no longer regarded methods as the key factors to guarantee the success of language learning.
મહત્વપૂર્ણ લિંક
સામાયિક કસોટી નું નવું ટાઈમટેબલ ડાઉનલોડ કરવા માટે અહીં ક્લિક કરો
વિદ્યા સહાયક નવી ભરતી વિગતવાર માહિતી માટે અહીં ક્લિક કરો
There are at least five criticisms addressed to the use of methods. First, it is top-down criticism on the property of methods. In practice, methods typically prescribe for teachers on how to teach. The teachers have to accept faithfully the claims or the theory underlying the methods and apply them to their own practice. Good teaching is regarded as correct use of the methods and their prescribed principles and techniques to be used in the classroom. So, in this case, the role of the teachers is marginalized because their role is not only to understand the methods but apply their principles correctly. Learners are sometimes as regarded as the passive recipients of the methods and they are supposed to only submit themselves to their regime of exercises and activities.
Methods are absent of a concept of learner-center and teacher creativity without acknowledgement that learners bring different learning styles and preferences to the learning process, that they should be consulted in the process of developing teaching programs, that teaching methods must be flexible and adaptive to learners' needs and interests. There is often little room for the teachers' own personal initiative and teaching style. The teachers must submit themselves to the method.
Second, methods are often misunderstood and are often promoted as all-purpose solutions as to be able to overcome teaching problems. Methods are thought to be applicable in any part of the world and applicable under any circumstance. Teachers sometimes ignore what is the starting point in language program design, i.e., a careful consideration of the context in which teaching and learning occurs including the cultural, the political, the local institutional context and the context constituted by the teachers and learners in their classrooms.
Third, it is the need for curriculum development although it takes time to find methods which will be likely to achieve teaching objectives. The teaching method needs to be carefully examined, developed, tried in schools and materials judged and it should also be assessed whether objectives are achieved and finally needs the feedback of all experience gained, to provide a starting point for further study. The elements are viewed as forming a network of interacting systems. The choice of teaching method can not determined separately from other planning and implementation practice.
Fourth, methods lack research basis. Methods are often based on the assumption that the process second language learning are fully understood. Some methods are not written based on research and researchers do not write books on methods or they are written without being empirically tested. In fact, many books are written by method gurus are full of claims and assertions about people learn languages, few of which are based on second language acquisition research or have been empirically tested.
Fifth, it is the similarity of classroom practice. Some methods are different at the beginning but later on in the classroom they are practiced similarly. It is very difficult for teachers to use methods in ways that precisely reflect the underlying principles of the methods. Teachers use different methods implemented in class with different activities to contrast methods particularly those based on classroom activities, do not exist in actual practice. Methods in general, are quite distinctive at the beginning stages of a language course, and rather indistinguishable, e.g. in a Community Language Learning Class, but within a matter of weeks, they can look like any other learner-centered curriculum.
Based on the above discussion, it is believed that teaching methods have played a central role in the development of language teaching. It will continue to be useful for teachers and student teachers to be familiar with major teaching methods proposed for second and foreign language teaching but should be usefully studied, mastered selectively and creatively and should be applicable in order to
(1) learn how different approaches and methods are used and understood when they are useful,
(2) understand some of the issues and controversies that characterize the history of language teaching,
(3) to participate in language learning experiences based different methods as basis for reflection and comparison
(4) to be aware of the rich set of activity resources available to the imaginative teacher,
(5) to appreciate how theory and practice can be linked from a variety of different perspectives. However, teachers need to be able to use approaches and methods flexibly and creatively based on their own judgment and experience.
Because of the general nature of approaches, there is often no clear of their assumptions and principles in the classroom. It is difficult for teachers to understand and to use them. Methods lack clear practical application, and require special training, and necessitate major changes in teachers' practices. The notion of methods received criticism in the 1990s for other reasons, and a number of limitations implicit in the notion of all-purpose methods were raised. Then, by the end of twentieth century, mainstream language teaching no longer regarded methods as the key factors to guarantee the success of language learning.
Education Research and Training (NCERT), MHRD.
ફ્રેમ બનાવવા નીચે
પ્રજાસતાક દિન નિમિતે ડીઝીટલ કાર્ડ બનાવવા લીંક
પ્રજાસતાક દિન નિમિતે ડીઝીટલ કાર્ડ બનાવવા લીંક
Celebrate the special bond you share with your best friend with these cute and loving friendship greetings.
ગાંધીજયંતી ફોટોફ્રેમ 1 બનાવવા માટે અહીં ક્લિક કરો.
ગાંધીજયંતી ફોટોફ્રેમ 2 બનાવવા માટે અહીં ક્લિક કરો.
ગાંધીજયંતી ફોટોફ્રેમ 3 બનાવવા માટે અહીં ક્લિક કરો.
The best digital photo frames
*આરોગ્ય કર્મીઓના પ્રશ્નોનું આવ્યું નિરાકરણ : અંતે રાજ્ય સરકારે સ્વીકારી માગ, રૂ.4 હજારનો ઉચ્ચક પગાર વધારો જાહેર કરાયો*
મહત્વપૂર્ણ લિંક
સામાયિક કસોટી નું નવું ટાઈમટેબલ ડાઉનલોડ કરવા માટે અહીં ક્લિક કરો
◆ પ્રથમ સત્ર ધોરણ 3 થી 8 એચડી સમયપત્રક ડાઉનલોડ કરવા અહીં ક્લિક કરો
◆ પરીક્ષાનો સંપૂર્ણ સમયપત્રક અને પરિપત્ર ડાઉનલોડ કરવા માટે અહીં ક્લિક કરો
રેલીમાં જવા માટેની ફોટો ફ્રેમ બનાવવાની ક્લિક કરો
ગઈ કાલે રાજ્ય પ્રમુખ શ્રી દિગ્વિજયસિંહ જાડેજા સાથે ગઈકાલની બેઠકમાં ચર્ચા થયેલ છે.
ગઈકાલ ની બેઠક માં થયેલ ચર્ચા મુજબ સરકાર જૂથ વીમો જે 200 સામે 200000 મળે છે તેના બદલે 1000 rs કપાય અને 1000000/ આપવા અંગે સરકાર સહમત થઈ છે.
2. ગ્રેજયુટી ની રકમ જે અત્યારે 8 લાખ છે એના બદલે 15 લાખ અથવા 16 લાખ કરવાની પણ વાત સરકારે કરી છે.
3. સાતમા પગાર પંચના ભથ્થા આપવા પણ તૈયાર.
4. મહિલા કર્મચારીઓ ને પ્રથમ દિવસ થી જ પ્રસૂતિ સબબ ની 180 દિવસ ની રજા મળવા માટે પણ સહમતી દર્શાવી છે.
5. સી.સી.સી. ની મુદત વધારવા પણ સરકારે સહમતી દર્શાવી છે.
જૂની પેન્શન યોજના બાબતે સરકાર 10% ના બદલે 14% ઉમેરે એ બાબતે આપણાં પ્રમુખશ્રી એ સહમતી ન દર્શાવી મિટિંગ માં સ્પષ્ટ ના પાડી દીધેલ છે. રાજ્ય સરકારે કેબિનેટ માં ચર્ચા કરવાની પણ વાત કરેલ છે. અને OPS બાબતે આજે ફરીથી મિટિંગ પણ છે.
જૂની પેન્શન યોજના બાબતે જ્યાં સુંધી હકારાત્મક નિર્ણય ન આવે ત્યાં સુંધી આપણાં બધાં જ કાર્યક્રમ યથાવત રહેશે એવી વાત પણ દિગ્વિજયસિંહ જાડેજા એ કરેલ.
Join us
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FXT2GPo1rep66qhYxNWzAJ
વિદ્યા સહાયક નવી ભરતી વિગતવાર માહિતી માટે અહીં ક્લિક કરો
Important link
બ્રેકીંગ ન્યૂઝ
🛑🛑🛑🛑🛑
હવે કારમાં બેઠેલા તમામ લોકો માટે સીટ બેલ્ટ ફરજિયાત,
કેન્દ્રીય મંત્રી નીતિન ગડકરીએ આપી જાણકારી 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Teacher day celebration useful
■ શિક્ષક દિન વિશે નિબંધ
■ દરેક શિક્ષકનું સન્માન સાંભળવા લાયક ખૂબ જ સુંદર વક્તવ્ય. ◆
■ શિક્ષક દિવસ પર ભાષણ આપવા માટે ઉપયોગી જુઓ ◆
■ શિક્ષક દિવસ નિબંધ ગુજરાતી જુઓ ◆
■ શિક્ષક દિવસ ઉપર ગુરુ પર કવિતા ટીચર્સ શાયરી જુઓ
■ શિક્ષક દિવસ ઉપર બેસ્ટ શિક્ષકો માટે શાયરી અને મેસેજ કલેક્શન ◆
With Background Eraser, your life will be easier. No complex print processing skill demanded, you can get an accurate stamp in one valve and use it for.
Photo Editor with Background Eraser-MagiCut
This is the stylish background eraser which helps you automatically cut out filmland with AI tools, remove background and make a transparent PNG stamp in high quality.
✅ Transparent background PNG picture
✅ YouTube thumbnail
✅ Sticker for WhatsApp
✅ Gacha Life
✅ Meme maker
✅ JPEG print with white background
✅ Change background for ID print
✅ Nature print editor
FULL FEATURES FOR FREE
💯 AI bus Mode
- It recognizes filmland well with people, creatures, shops, anime
Just elect the print, advanced AI tool will cut out the object impeccably in 1 click
- No need to abolish complicate backgrounds awkwardly bit by bit with fritters
Manual Mode
- snappily figure the object on your print you want to cut
- Erase and repair the cutout picture fluently
Shape Mode
- Crop filmland into a forecourt, cube, heart, circle and numerous shapes as you like
- It's veritably suitable for make your own stickers or meme
Background remover
This is the easiest background way app that helps you to remove backgrounds from prints and make PNG in one second. Its advanced AI cutout tool will cut out your picture automatically. And it's completely for free!
Background photo editor
Want to change background for your print? Try this png maker to remove background from prints at first also you can change the background you like for it.
Cutout photo editor
Use this advanced cutout print editor, abolish background impeccably with this png maker. It's also a background print editor and nature print editor designed for you to make artworks fluently and snappily.
About permissions:
- To remove background from prints and make transparent background, Background Eraser needs the “ Storage ” authorization to pierce prints and lines on your device.
- To capture prints and abolish background, Background Eraser needs the “ Camera ” authorization to take filmland.
With Background Eraser, your life will be easier. No complex print processing skill demanded, you can get an accurate stamp in one valve and use it for
There are at least five criticisms addressed to the use of methods. First, it is top-down criticism on the property of methods. In practice, methods typically prescribe for teachers on how to teach. The teachers have to accept faithfully the claims or the theory underlying the methods and apply them to their own practice. Good teaching is regarded as correct use of the methods and their prescribed principles and techniques to be used in the classroom. So, in this case, the role of the teachers is marginalized because their role is not only to understand the methods but apply their principles correctly. Learners are sometimes as regarded as the passive recipients of the methods and they are supposed to only submit themselves to their regime of exercises and activities.
Methods are absent of a concept of learner-center and teacher creativity without acknowledgement that learners bring different learning styles and preferences to the learning process, that they should be consulted in the process of developing teaching programs, that teaching methods must be flexible and adaptive to learners' needs and interests. There is often little room for the teachers' own personal initiative and teaching style. The teachers must submit themselves to the method.
Second, methods are often misunderstood and are often promoted as all-purpose solutions as to be able to overcome teaching problems. Methods are thought to be applicable in any part of the world and applicable under any circumstance. Teachers sometimes ignore what is the starting point in language program design, i.e., a careful consideration of the context in which teaching and learning occurs including the cultural, the political, the local institutional context and the context constituted by the teachers and learners in their classrooms.
Third, it is the need for curriculum development although it takes time to find methods which will be likely to achieve teaching objectives. The teaching method needs to be carefully examined, developed, tried in schools and materials judged and it should also be assessed whether objectives are achieved and finally needs the feedback of all experience gained, to provide a starting point for further study. The elements are viewed as forming a network of interacting systems. The choice of teaching method can not determined separately from other planning and implementation practice.
Fourth, methods lack research basis. Methods are often based on the assumption that the process second language learning are fully understood. Some methods are not written based on research and researchers do not write books on methods or they are written without being empirically tested. In fact, many books are written by method gurus are full of claims and assertions about people learn languages, few of which are based on second language acquisition research or have been empirically tested.
Fifth, it is the similarity of classroom practice. Some methods are different at the beginning but later on in the classroom they are practiced similarly. It is very difficult for teachers to use methods in ways that precisely reflect the underlying principles of the methods. Teachers use different methods implemented in class with different activities to contrast methods particularly those based on classroom activities, do not exist in actual practice. Methods in general, are quite distinctive at the beginning stages of a language course, and rather indistinguishable, e.g. in a Community Language Learning Class, but within a matter of weeks, they can look like any other learner-centered curriculum.
Based on the above discussion, it is believed that teaching methods have played a central role in the development of language teaching. It will continue to be useful for teachers and student teachers to be familiar with major teaching methods proposed for second and foreign language teaching but should be usefully studied, mastered selectively and creatively and should be applicable in order to
(1) learn how different approaches and methods are used and understood when they are useful,
(2) understand some of the issues and controversies that characterize the history of language teaching,
(3) to participate in language learning experiences based different methods as basis for reflection and comparison
(4) to be aware of the rich set of activity resources available to the imaginative teacher,
(5) to appreciate how theory and practice can be linked from a variety of different perspectives. However, teachers need to be able to use approaches and methods flexibly and creatively based on their own judgment and experience.